|
|
|
The Revised American Dream
|
 |
|
Location: Blogs PaleBlueScot Semi-Lucid Rants |
 |
| Posted by: James |
8/17/2006 2:15 PM |
|
There’s a story that was
passed on to me the other day and I had to check around to ensure it indeed was
true. It winds up being legit and I’m
still in awe that this particular company actually thought was they did was a
helpful action.
Without getting into the
details of the story, Northwest Airlines, which is bankrupt and on the verge of
laying off more employees, gave out suggestions to these potential laid-off
employees on ways to save money. They
gave out pamphlets to a certain amount of employees and also temporarily posted
the same thing on their internal website.
The four-page booklet, "Preparing for a Financial
Setback" contained suggestions such as shopping in thrift stores, taking
"a date for a walk along the beach or in the woods" and not being
"shy about pulling something you like out of the trash."”
The bottom line is that while
Northwest is at least giving a heads-up in saying “Hey, your job is most likely
going to be eliminated”, they are also saying “And since you probably won’t
have a job, don’t feel you’re ‘above’ dumpster diving.” I can’t believe a company would suggest
soon-to-be-fired employees that it’s ok to root around in trash. WOW.
People that are desperate don’t need to be told how to forage for
themselves and I’m sure people who currently scavenge trash don’t need
instructions or tips or hints on how to scrounge for discarded pieces of food
or clothes.
Are we coming full-circle
from FDR’s “New Deal” to a time when we don’t blink anymore when another
American company lays off tens of thousands of people? Shouldn’t we be shocked when a company gives
employees tips on how to scrounge for survival? Am I over-reacting to a company’s legitimate
attempt at helping people out who they know they have to fire? What’s next – a hotline to find out how to
star on the next DVD of “Bumfights”?
Glossy pamphlets glorifying the food lines from the heydays of Communist
Russia?
|
|
| Permalink |
Trackback |
Comments (13)
Add Comment
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By A Capitalist on
8/17/2006 2:58 PM |
| I have to agree with you, that the pamphlet was a PR F'up. That is right there with Disney telling us to go to our desks, and if HR didn't call you in by the end of the day, you would have a job tomorrow. They also said that we should keep working as normal. However I'm confused at your layoff issues. Laying off 30,000 people really isn't that much in the grand scheme of things. Unemployment is at 4.8%. The bench mark for full employment of the country is 5% if I remember correctly. The population is roughly 300 milliion. So that says that there is roughly .0001% of the population loosing their jobs. Economies of scale answer your question that "No" it isn't a blink anymore. It is far behind a car chase or American Idol news topic. The bigger news story is the fact that these antiquated business models of the big 4 arilines are inflexible to modern demand. In the end the corporation must survive if retirees and employees are to maintain anything. Look around your office, how many stenographers, transcribers, and dedicated typists have lost their jobs due to the PC. Layoffs suck, don't get me wrong. They are also a part of evolution. Adapt or die. |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By Syl on
8/17/2006 2:59 PM |
| Geting closer, but full circle would be the lines for food during our own US depression. Check out our national deficit these days... |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By dhs on
8/17/2006 3:37 PM |
You all need to read "The World Is Flat".
Do I feel bad for people who lose their jobs like this? Absolutely.
Is it an opportunity to reinvent yourself and grow into a new career? For many, yes.
In the book, the author argues that the American dream of a job for life is gone. You need to invest in yourself and companies should do the same. That way, as times and jobs change, people are able to fill the new roles effectively because they have continued to learn and grow. Makes total sense to me!
-dhs |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By Ratt on
8/17/2006 5:57 PM |
| That's right, there are plenty of jobs around these days, thanks to our current government. Why, I know plenty of people who work two or even three jobs.....guess they just love working that much. |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By Syl on
8/18/2006 11:48 AM |
| I don't think your standard American really dreams of a job for life, they dream of being a national star in sports or entertainment. After reality and time ages them, then they simply dream of stabliity for their families' sake. They dream of the same spouse for life and less of a struggle to survive. Oh well. Dreamin' is still free. |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By KB's on
8/18/2006 12:02 PM |
| Laying off 30,000 people is a massive cutback. On the flip side, I wonder how much the upper escelon of senior management makes. I am willing to guarantee that the top 1000 people in that company make the same amount as the 30,000 people that they are laying off. The disparity between the the top management and average salaries are at all time highs for corporate America. Why should people be paid millions a year for a company that is failing?? |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By Crowder on
8/18/2006 12:54 PM |
| Ragarding the salary disparities, there is only one group to blame, the public. If the company is publicly traded that is. You might want to also ask why Congress keeps giving themselves raises? It isn't like they are doing a great job. My company charges 30% interest for their financing. Some customers complain, some accept, and some are thankful that we gave them the chance to start their own company. The majority of people prefer to be in the first two categories. The mentality is that it is better to lie in the mire of disappointment with many than rise out of it and be scorned by those you left behind. It is the old addage that it is hard to soar with the eagles when you are surrounded by turkeys. I like the idea of executive salries being tied to the company's performance. However I'm guessing that the argument against the bonuses that the gas companies have given out will emerge as unfair and exploitive. The fact is that jealousy rules, people shouldn't be paid alot. It would be ok if everyone was though. If you own stock in any company that you are complaining about, ask youself why you don't go to a shareholders meeting and do something? Would you feel guilty owning Chevron stock? Would you sell it on principal, or take the earnings and give it to those who are needy? Check to see who is in your 401k. Public companies must make the stock go up. They also rely on the same concept as politicians, that being that the encumbant will win the election. It isn't because they are naturally better, it is because the voter is usually uneducated in the topic and goes with the status quo. So I say scream at the wall, get a big group together. Until you vote to make the change all you are is silly. It is easy to blame, and very difficult to act. If you think that the first choice in any executives thoughts are to cut employees, you are wrong. Just like an officer in the military. They don't want soldiers to die, but that is what the job entails. Executives are willing to make those decisions and live with them. |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By Donna on
8/21/2006 11:59 AM |
Spot on Crowder! It is very easy to sit back and bitch about how ridiculous it is to cut jobs and say the CEO is an idiot. Fact remains, she or he is on the hook and accountable to the stockholders. If the stockholders were screaming at him to make sure he keeps every single person employed, that is what he would strive to do. Fact remains, execs have to figure out how to make money and that means attrition, downsizing, out with the old in with the new, running as thin as possible for as long as possible. Same with our members in Congress. If you don't vote, don't bitch. The airline's business model has to change in order to meet the demands in which its faced. I hope the airlines figure out what's broken and figure out how to fix it in order to continue enabling air travel. Othewise, my fear is a monopolized industry. That would hurt.
As far as the shit-heads that passed out the pamplets.... what fucking idiots!! Pass out the book "The World is Flat". It's an easy read and offers a lot of value.
|
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By James on
8/21/2006 12:32 PM |
| Donna, you do realize DHS already wrote "You all need to read "The World Is Flat"." in a previous comment, right? ;) Tard. |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By Crowder on
8/21/2006 6:13 PM |
This from a liberal rag.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14208060/site/newsweek/ |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By Actually living it not just talking about it on
8/22/2006 10:26 AM |
Nice defense of the CEOs and nice thoughts about re-inventing yourself. Let me tell you my story.
Got laid off a month ago after 6 years with a company. First 3 years we continually grew a new product and no one was happy with the rate of growth. Fact is the sales were increasing despite micro managing by idiots who didn't know what the Hell they were doing. An example of this, when I asked for where the pricing came from so I could justify it to customers, I found out they did no cost-profit analysis, they literally picked numbers out of thin air they thought they could sell it for. This despite the fact none of them had a day of experience with this technology. Turns out those were the good old days. A merger happens and the new person in charge knows nothing about our product and pretty much wants to get rid of it (although at the time she was sweet talking us and we had no idea). So, a combination of bad moves internally and a lack of repsonse to a new competitor leaves us with not only a bad sales model but now also with an inferior product. Out of misplaced loyalty I tried to tell people what needed to be done, was ignored and sales have progressively gone down the shitter. We once had 362 clients but after the downturn there are currently around 105 clients.
So who pays the price? Not the management, no it's me the poor bastard on the front lines. After 6 years I got a severance of......2 weeks.
So to the "it's a great time to re-invent yourself" person, explain how I could re-invent myself while trying to support a family with a whole 2 weeks pay?? I know we could sell our nice house that I've worked my ass off to afford, buy a trailer and I can start all over again for a 1/3rd of the pay!!! Explain that one to the wife and kiddies.
Meanwhile the biatch president gets kudos for showing a profit. Never mind that her short sited process of cutting internal resources and support to the bone with result ultimately in the ruin of the company down the road (overall sales for all products are almost half of what they once were).
That won't matter to her though, she'll be retired and living full time on Martha's Vineyard by then. The many lives she's wreaked havoc on won't even nip at her conscience.
BTW Crowder, this is a private company, there's no voting at meetings to affect things, and trust me the people running the show could care les about who's being fired and who's not. |
|
|
Re: American Company, Revised |
By Syl on
8/22/2006 12:15 PM |
| The truth, echoing thoughout the US business world - no reward for loyalty. This is the why and how 'trickle-down' will never work here, no altruism, no loyalty to the company and the people who made it. Just sell it for $ -- if you can. |
|
|
Re: The Revised American Dream |
By Erich on
8/22/2006 1:23 PM |
I found the link to the pamphlet
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0821061nwa1.html |
|
|
|
|
|
Blog_List
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blog_Archive
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Search_Blog
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Links
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Me
|
 |
|
|
|
|