Search  
Monday, October 06, 2008 ..:: Suburban Dad, Urban Attitude ::..   Login
 Hampton Inns - Where We Encourage Mescaline Usage!!! Minimize
Location: BlogsPaleBlueScotSemi-Lucid Rants    
Posted by: James 4/21/2008 12:08 PM

As a general rule, when rock songs are used in commercials it devalues the whole reason those songs were made.  Far be in from me to stop anyone from making a buck, as if you own the rights to a song you can do what you want with it.  I do think that established rock bands, ones with a huge catalog from which they receive tremendous royalties from, debase the initial reasons behind the making of those songs when they do this. 

 

When the Rolling Stones sold their song ‘Start Me Up’ for the launch of Windows 95, they didn’t do it because they were hurting for cash.  They did it so maybe Keith Richards could have another mountain of cocaine the size you normally see in Department of Transportation building that house salt piles used in melting ice and snow on the road.

 

The same thing goes for when Led Zeppelin decided to piss on their legacy and allow Cadillac to use their song ‘Rock and Roll’.  It’s not as though Zeppelin had squandered their fortune and were playing songs for cash in a London subway station. 

 

In a non-direct fashion, this leads me to a commercial I watched last week in one of the few times I see live TV anymore.  An ad for Hampton Inns came on and the song was immediately familiar.  It was a cover of the Beatles classic “With A Little Help From My Friends”.  Ignoring the fact that it was a horrific cover song and that they don’t have to pay royalties if you don’t use the original, there was a completely different question I had for this marketing campaign.

 

On the surface, the implying factor is that the staff at Hampton Inns will treat you and help you like an old friend.  But did anyone in the advertising agency that was responsible for this realize what the actual song initially stood for?  “I get by with a little help from my friends”, while possible a tad more subtle than “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds”, was still about drug use!  The Beatles’ “friends” were pot, acid, mushrooms and any other illicit drug they could get their hands on at the time!  Granted, most musicians make their best music while high as a kite, so I can’t blame them for creating odes to their creative master.

 

This is comparable to if Amtrak using the Grateful Dead’s song ‘Casey Jones’ song in an ad campaign.  Sure they’re talking about riding that train but they’re also high on cocaine.

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (7)   Add Comment
Re: Hampton Inns - Where We Encourage Mescaline Usage!!!    By KB's on 4/21/2008 1:21 PM
How about a Chicago rental car place using the "Lake Shore Drive" tune from Aliotta Haynes and Jeremiah<br><br> Well there ain't no road just like it, anywhere I've found,<br> Runnin' south on Lake Shore Drive, headin' into town.<br> Just slippin' on by on L.S.D., Friday night trouble bound.

Re: Hampton Inns - Where We Encourage Mescaline Usage!!!    By TSAC on 4/21/2008 9:22 PM
Meatloaf's At&t Commercial, 'nuff said. $$$$$$$$$$$$$

Re: Hampton Inns - Where We Encourage Mescaline Usage!!!    By Syl on 4/21/2008 10:27 PM
Nice visual on the pile of white stuff there, James................................................................................................... Meatloaf might need the money, he probably wishes he'd gotten a percentage of Rocky Horror Picture Show.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>Some songs go straight to commercial the way some movies go straight to cable. I, of course, hate commercials. Is there anything they don't devalue?

Re: Hampton Inns - Where We Encourage Mescaline Usage!!!    By Muuurph on 4/22/2008 9:46 AM
My guess is that in the majority of these cases, the artist have little or no say in the matter. Remember, the Beatles don't own the rights to their music. Michael Jackson bought them once, he's since sold them to someone else. So while Paul McCartney still gets royalties, he has no say at all in where the music is used. Typically when a new artist signs a record deal it states the record company owns the rights to the music. This is pretty much standard language in any record contract, as far as I know. It's also why many stars once, they fulfill a deal with a record company that requires, say 5 records, start their own recording companies. Those deals requiring x amount of records are also what leads to so many "Greatest Hits" albums being released. Take 10 of your old songs, add 2 to it and you've just released a new album, according to the legalese in the contract. So don't think of the artists as being money grabbers (although Robert Plante may fit that description). In the case of the Hampton Inn commercial The Beatles had no say in their song being used.

Re: Hampton Inns - Where We Encourage Mescaline Usage!!!    By James on 4/22/2008 10:04 AM
With the Beatles song, since it was a cover I doubt the Jackson estate sold the rights. Unless someone is sampling a song, or a riff in a song, a cover song pays no royalties to the originator.

Re: Hampton Inns - Where We Encourage Mescaline Usage!!!    By Muuurph on 4/22/2008 2:23 PM
I meant Jackson bought the whole Beatles catalog once, but I think he sold it to someone since. I'll remember not to hit refresh this time so this only posts once. Find a different blog host already will ya? Sheesh.

Re: Hampton Inns - Where We Encourage Mescaline Usage!!!    By Kevin on 4/29/2008 7:37 PM
How about Geico's use of the Legendary Shack Shakers' CB Song. It's a trucker sining about going to see his lady. Which is fine until he refers to her as his "little lot lizard" which is slang for a hooker....<br><a href="http://www.commondiscourtesy/com">--Kevin</a><br>


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 

  

 Blog_List Minimize

      

 Blog_Archive Minimize

    

 Search_Blog Minimize

    

 Links Minimize

      

 Contact Me Minimize



Cancel   Send

    

Copyright 2008 by PaleBlueScot Productions   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement
DotNetNuke® is copyright 2002-2008 by Perpetual Motion Interactive Systems Inc.