Search  
Thursday, October 16, 2008 ..:: Suburban Dad, Urban Attitude ::..   Login
 Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago Minimize
Location: BlogsPaleBlueScotSlices of Life    
Posted by: James 9/19/2006 12:17 PM

I’m still trying to gather my Vegas thoughts, so those should be online later this week.  In the meantime, I figured I’d go out of chronological order and talk about my arduous flight back from Vegas.  By no means is this going to be a rant against airlines.  Weather-related issues are beyond anyone’s control.  This is simply a recap of my day’s events on Sunday coming back from Vegas.

Normally I don’t use connecting flights.  Ever.  Unless it’s absolutely necessary.  Now that we’ve declared a War On Liquids, most people have to check in their luggage unless they decide to buy toiletries in the city they’re going to and then throwing them away upon their return.  So I had a choice of either checking in my baggage with all the liquids/gels/viscous substances I normally use or I could not bring any toiletries and just buy them when I got to Vegas.  The last thing I wanted to do was find a drug store when I go to town so I decided to check in the bags.  The flight to Vegas, via Dallas, went baggage-incident free.

My return trip was Las Vegas to Chicago to Atlanta.  The weather, as expected, in Vegas was sunny so there wasn’t a delay and the pilot estimated we might actually land at O’Hare a few minutes ahead of time but that we were racing to beat a storm there.  Two hours passed and the pilot makes the announcement that the storm has arrived in Chicago and we are in a holding pattern.  He then proceeds to mention that we are low on fuel and if we have to hold any longer than 50 minutes (which we did), we will have to divert the flight to Milwaukee.

The next set of sequences made us all lose a little bit of faith in the pilot.  A few minutes later he announced that O’Hare was now not accepting incoming flights so we will be diverted to Milwaukee.  A few minutes after that he said there was another change in plans and that we had a small window in which to land in Chicago which was good since we were getting low on fuel.  He said we would be on the ground in 25 minutes.  Another minute passed and he came back on the intercom and said “Correction.  It is actually an hour and 10 minutes until we land in Chicago.”  This is when we all started to look at each other and wonder how he could have been so wrong in his calculations.  On top of this, since he mentioned twice already how low on fuel we were, were his calculations off for that too and we’d have to make an emergency landing in Ames, Iowa or some remote place?

Five more minutes pass and he then announces that O’Hare once again is not allowing planes to land so we indeed are going to Milwaukee since we are low on fuel (why is he continuing to mention this?).  All of us by this point just want to land somewhere, anywhere.  We safely land in Milwaukee and stay on the tarmac while they refuel us for the 20 minute flight to O’Hare.  While refueling, the pilot came back on theintercom and, in funny moment of truth, said “We’re waiting to hear from O’Hare as to whether we will be able to land there.  To be honest, I have no idea what’s going on.”

While waiting in Milwaukee, we find out from a lady who sat across the aisle from me that she was just returning from a funeral for her bother, who died in an airplane crash.  Yeah, that’s not gonna help calm the nerves.  I think we might have been at that airport for about an hour (not bad for a diverted flight) and we finally are airborne again and land at O’Hare.

Here is where I got semi-lucky based on a few variables.  One was the fact that I was in the 10th row which allowed me to get off the plane quicker than most.  As soon as I got off, I walked briskly to the Departures monitor to see if by chance by Chicago-Atlanta flight had also been delayed.  It indeed was but the status was blinking “Final Boarding”.  I was in section K, the plane was in L.  I’m not sure how security officers deal with people running through airports now but I alternated between running and walking briskly and got to the gate where my plane was.  The gate door was closed and it was the last flight out of Chicago to Atlanta for the evening.

Thankfully the gate agent called the plane and let me in right as they were getting ready to leave.  Since I’m still relatively new at my job, I didn’t want to be forced to take an additional day off work.  “Sure James, yeah, sure you missed your flight from Vegas.  A likely story, you hung-over, debauched cretin.”

Of course, there wasn't a chance in hell that my baggage was going to make the flight, which meant I’d have to go through the motions at Hartsfield and wait for my flight’s luggage to pass through, make sure it wasn’t there, and then report it missing.  45 minutes later I’m finally able to officially make my claim.  Thankfully I lost my luggage on the way back home and not on the way to a vacation destination.  They finally found my luggage and dropped it off at my house late last night, less than 24 hours after I had reported it missing.

A few notes about traveling during the War On Liquids phase our country is currently in.  Most people are now checking their baggage which allows for much faster boarding times.  The flip side to this is they still have to load it all and so our flight out of Atlanta was slightly delayed since we boarded the plane in less than 10 minutes.  In addition, since the flight from Vegas to Chicago didn’t give complimentary snacks, only purchasable snack boxes which contained scary stuff like beef logs, I didn’t eat for about 12 hours with the exception of the snack pack on the Chicago to Atlanta leg of the trip.  I ate that damn thing like a refugee.

What is today’s lesson?  Unless you don’t have a choice, don’t make a connecting flight especially if you have to check in luggage.  It’s not worth the price savings unless it’s several hundred dollars.  For a measly seventy dollar savings, my day blossomed from a 4 hour flight to a 12 hour ordeal.

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (10)   Add Comment
Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By KB's on 9/19/2006 1:01 PM
It sounds like we were flying about the same time on Sunday. I had a direct flight from Denver to Midway. We got diverted to Milwaukee with the same low fuel problem. I couldn't help but think as we were sitting there (not being able to get off) that they could put us and our luggage on about 3 buses and we would get to Midway before the plane would. But, I really felt bad for the people that actually had connecting flights to Milwaukee. There they are sitting in Milwaukee a couple hours ahead of schedule except they have to fly back to Midway and hopefully catch a connecting flight back to Milwaukee. The airline gave the Milwaukee people the option to get off the plane, but their luggage was going back to Midway and who know what flight or when it would get to Milwaukee.

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By Muuurph on 9/19/2006 3:16 PM
Yes, take it from someone who used to fly almost weekly for years. Never, ever, ever, take connecting flights if it can be avoided. I actaully fly from O'hare rather than Midway based on this rule of mine. It's resulted in my miles being divided between airlines, which I rather wouldn't have, but it's worth avoiding the pain and aggravation of running to a connecting flight.

This leads me to my 2nd rule though, which you violated. This is never, ever, check bags if you can avoid it at all. Now I haven't flown since the War On Liquids began, so maybe I'm missing something, but what liquids can't you live without for a couple days??? Hair Gel? Use snot, fag boy, or of course you can go the "Something About Mary" route. Or try a non-metrosexual hair style. Mouthwash? I'm lucky enough to rarely need it, but I know any self-respecting hotel will have this gratis for you. Same goes for toothpaste (is that allowed on carry-on?) and hand lotion.

In any case, if you can't live without any of these liquids for a couple days than I would suggest that you sir, are a faggot.

Now contact lens solution might pose a problem, but I'm thinking I'd rather get raped at the hotel gift shop for a small bottle than check my bags. After all, it's the convenience you're paying for.

Don't get me wrong James, I sympathize with you. Affter all, it's these types of nightmares that make you learn your lessons.

By the way, don't think you have us fooled, we know this is all a cover story for being too hungover to get to work Monday, you debauched cretin.

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By JA3 on 9/19/2006 4:45 PM
The bright sides of the WoL (at least what I've seen in Providence), if you can handle buying your supplies when you arrive, is that the security lines take no time at all, and there's plenty of room for bags in the overheads.

My vegas flight last month, we spent almost an hour getting to the Southwest checkin desk in providence (paper tickets suck) but had zero wait to go through security -- and instead of the usual caravan of refugees trying to drag 80lbs of carryons each onto the flight, there were maybe 3 roller bags total on our capacity flight.

I have to go to Chicago next month, and I already know my first stop off the plane will be Walgreens.

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By JA3 on 9/19/2006 5:10 PM
One more thing I've thought about regarding the "WoL" -- as great as it is today for us non-liquid-dependent travelers to have fewer of our neighbors bringing their carry-ons, in the end it's going to be the airlines and ALL customers, regardless of carry-on habits, who get f'd over by this.

I realized as soon as I got to Providence and saw all the people checking bags rather than carrying them on that the WoL completely screws many of the "front of the house" efficiencies introduced by the airlines. Instead of the relatively labor-free (for the airlines) process of having many customers get an boarding pass online or at the kiosk and handle their own bags, they've got a far more labor-intensive process now, requiring more people at the checkin counter to check the bags, more skycaps at the curb and more baggage handlers to move the bags, if they expect to keep the flights on time. Their only other options are fewer flights or just giving up on being on time -- none of these are good news for the customers.

Also consider that more customer bags in the hold equals less room for 3rd party cargo -- so the airlines are losing another source of revenue that could keep ticket prices froom rising.

The airlines already had enough working against them; I think in the long run the WoL could be another nail in the coffin.

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By Red5 on 9/19/2006 6:05 PM
Sounds like an auful experience. Not my problem.

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By Erich on 9/20/2006 9:09 AM
Muuurph wrote: In any case, if you can't live without any of these liquids for a couple days than I would suggest that you sir, are a faggot.

truer words were never spoken

Red5 wrote: Sounds like an auful experience. Not my problem.

auful? that spelling is AWFUL! (but not an awful awful - inside RI joke)

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By Donna on 9/20/2006 10:03 AM
Sucks to be you, James...

I hate checking bags and do my very best NOT to check a bag EVER. Before the liquid ban and I was travelling weekly btwn STL and ATL, I would occasionally check a bag. When I would get to STL to gain the bag from the claim area, I could count on waiting minimum 30 minutes for the bag to show up. Sometimes even an hour. I absolutely hated the STL airport baggage claim. Now with the ban on liquids and more folks checking bags. . . the wait time is worse in STL. I thought it wasn't possible for the wait to get worse. . MAN!! Oh well. I don't travel to STL any longer. I just feel sorry for the poor bastards traveling to STL. I'm sure other locations had the same issue and this ban has made the baggage claim situation even more unbearable.

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By Syl on 9/20/2006 10:04 AM
Good lord, RI 'wit' - writer, please. We don't understand and don't care unless you explain. :) *deflecting/softening smiley sh--*
Sorry mid-westerners, not only do I avoid connecting flights I try my best to avoid Chicago! From here I can work on connections via LA yuck, Houston, Dallas, and Atlanta.

Toothpaste is not allowed.

The security lines have been faster, but checked luggage waiting makes me tired. The waits are longer for a different reason, as you watch another billet of bags approach to be loaded.

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By Dom on 9/21/2006 5:59 AM
That's a horrible experience. But I agree. They say the shortest distance
between 2 points is a straight line. It practically applies here. Things are least likely to go wrong with one flight than two. I've learned that everytime I've taken connecting flight. No more man. But the bottom line, you did make it back safe and in one piece. Probably cranky and pissed as hell, but you made it. So see you next year in Vegas?

Re: Atlanta, by way of Milwaukee and Chicago    By Red 5 on 10/1/2006 9:49 PM
Erich's Mom is both auful and awful


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 

  

 Blog_List Minimize

      

 Blog_Archive Minimize

    

 Search_Blog Minimize

    

 Links Minimize

      

 Contact Me Minimize



Cancel   Send

    

Copyright 2008 by PaleBlueScot Productions   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement
DotNetNuke® is copyright 2002-2008 by Perpetual Motion Interactive Systems Inc.